Search for: "Nuance Communications, Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
”2 Confounding and “Effect Size” There is a role of study “effect size” in evaluating potential invalidity due to confounding, but it is frequently more nuanced than acknowledged by courts. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Greg Mersol
Country Club, Inc., 887 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2018), which dealt with appeals from the denial of conditional certification by opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm by Ronda Muir
Then this month, Affectiva and Nuance Communications, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:27 am
The case of Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific Scimed Inc & Ors [2018] EWHC 1256 (Pat) handed down yesterday, is a little more nuanced. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Jordan Brunner
” In fact, the government asserts that the NDAA provision is worse for Kaspersky than DHS’s order because the NDAA bars the use of all Kaspersky products in all federal information systems, while the DHS directive prohibits only the use of certain Kaspersky services and embedded code in national security systems and systems used by the Defense Department and intelligence community. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
The coalition’s 25 representatives from all walks of Canada’s cultural community appropriately described the proposal as “a much needed solution to a large and growing problem that threatens the massive employment, economic, and cultural contributions of Canada’s film, television, and music industries. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Michael Broyde
Take, for example, the 1999 case of Encore Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
Looking for a landmark ruling on patent exhaustion, the patent community got just that in the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
Ultimately, the two concluded that though technology companies would claim immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. [read post]