Search for: "O S V Determination" Results 161 - 180 of 10,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  Those disclosures must address such issues as (i) whether they believe there are instances in which a corporation should take actions it is not legally required to take or refrain from taking actions it is legally permitted to take for the purpose of advancing the interests of non-shareholder stakeholders; (ii) if so, which other stakeholders the decision-makers will consider and how the corporation’s effect on each of them will be measured; (iii) whether they believe there are… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal, Pfizer challenged the Board’s obviousness determinations and its denial of Pfizer’s contingent motion to amend. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:01 am by Dennis Crouch
The PTAB relied on CyberSource Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
As the ILC’s Commentary to this provision explains, a State is “specially affected” by a breach when it is affected “in a way that distinguishes it from the generality of other States to which the obligation is owed”, and this is a relative question to be determined on a case-by-case basis (ARS Article 42 Commentary, para 12). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm by Guest Author
When the bank filed a request for review of the determination with the Director of Risk Management Supervision (“RMS”), the Director issued a decision concurring in the Regional Office’s determination. [read post]
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently determined there is not, as part of a precedential decision in the consolidated cases of Falcone v. [read post]
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently determined there is not, as part of a precedential decision in the consolidated cases of Falcone v. [read post]
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently determined there is not, as part of a precedential decision in the consolidated cases of Falcone v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm by Guest Author
Chief Justice Burger and Justices Brennan and O’Connor voted to affirm (though O’Connor later recused after inheriting stock in litigating companies). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:46 am by Eliana Baer
In reversing the trial court’s decision, the Appellate Division determined that the failure to adhere to the Rule’s requirements rendered the entire agreement unenforceable under New Jersey law. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
” There is no reliable data underlying that conclusion but there is, as Justice O’Connor once pointed out, strong evidence that elite colleges and law schools produce a disproportionate number of America’s political, economic, and legal elites. [read post]