Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 161 - 180
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
" Matter of Allen v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm
The third is the majority recognizing internal agency disciplinary proceedings as an alternative remedial scheme, where sanctions on the officer provide no relief or remedy to the injured plaintiff. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
The trial court granted Quilling’s motion and dismissed the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:18 am
” ” In this opinion the court granted the motion. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:08 am
Others are still awaiting oral argument or a decision on whether to grant a hearing at all. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
[09/23] US v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Petitioner was granted tenure in the mathematics tenure area, effective September 1, 2006. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Absolute judicial immunity attaches to a state medical review board's disciplinary proceeding where, as here, the individual charged has the right to be represented by counsel, to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses, and where the board articulates its findings and conclusions in a binding order under a preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Marbury v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:42 am
When combined with the employee’s 13 years of employment purportedly without any disciplinary issues and the employer’s failure to follow its progressive discipline protocol calling for counseling as the first step, the court found multiple fact issues, so summary judgment was inappropriate on this claim. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:56 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm
The district court appointed counsel and authorized a neuropsychological evaluation. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Sup. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
In a footnote to the last sentence above, the judge explains that Barry also alleged that he reported the defendants' alleged conduct to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Chicago Police Department (Cyber Crimes Division), the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, and the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.Epstein v. [read post]
