Search for: "P. v. Roles" Results 161 - 180 of 3,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:30 am by Courtney Cahill
Courtney Cahill Dissenting in the 1972 decision Stanley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Accordingly, we identify no error of law or fact in the district court's finding 'that Plaintiffs have failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that UGI and CL&P conducted operations at the MGPs in some sort of joint venture or joint undertaking, and that UGI's involvement with the individual MGPs was consistent with its role as an investor and shareholder of, and consultant to, CL&P.'"       Access the… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The construction of a legal franework around a right to a healthy environment, and the role of the state as the responsible party, will continue to evolve.Most interesting, at least preliminarily, is the development of standards round the fundamental prevent-mitigate-remedy principle, and the development of standards for the calculation of damages. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
Wilkie – has played a role in some important ADA cases, especially those concerning the line-of-sight issue for movie theaters and stadiums that Justice Kagan mentioned in her opinion. [read post]