Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2017, 6:05 am
"Justice Kagan writes that the lower courts in this case did not use the correct legal standard in setting the fine. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:27 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Nelson, though brief and largely unexplained, is generally considered to be the kind of controlling precedent for later cases raising precisely the same legal issues, but not if the precedent has been undermined by later “doctrinal developments,” in a phrase used by the Supreme Court in an otherwise unrelated case. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
Sitrick v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the complete-deference-to-the-government standard of Garcetti v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 1:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:54 pm
In Adams v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:28 am
Any aggregate royalty rates set must be precisely defined, derived and applied. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Sanofi v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:30 pm
Related Cases: State of Maryland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:27 pm
Simonian v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:15 am
EPA (No. 06-1322) and American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:08 am
My view is that it was always clear during FOSTA’s development that civil plaintiffs had to satisfy the more rigorous standards of 1591–essentially prove that a crime occurred, but using the lower proof standards available to civil claims. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
How does one show this precise definition? [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The problem is that from the judgment, it is not clear precisely what the relevant knowledge was. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:57 am
Markman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:18 am
So far, Huawei v. [read post]
