Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
In this case, the putative class consists of Louisiana citizens who purchased valued policy homeowners insurance from one of four defendants, State Farm, Allstate, Lafayette or Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
S. 303, 308 (1980) (quoting American Fruit Grow­ers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Merges, Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age (4th ed. 2006). [read post]