Search for: "Parks v. Phillips " Results 161 - 180 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 4:20 am by Donn Zaretsky
Also in that initial posting, I noted that the district court had followed the First Circuit in Phillips v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Finally, in Belmont Park v BNY and LBSF [2011] UKSC 38, [2011] All ER (D) 259 (Jul), one of many global cases arising from the insolvency of Lehman Brothers, the Supreme Court clarified the meaning and application of the common law insolvency principle known as the “anti deprivation rule”. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
The State asserted that the officer testified that he observed a video at the mini-mart where the truck was parked showing the defendant getting out of the truck. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP)   Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46)   South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP)   Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
. * Malcolm Weatherup v Nationwide News – more than $100,000 to a retired journalist accused of being “habitually intoxicated”, QLD. * Sean Carolan v Fairfax Media and Peter FitzSimons – $300,000 to a personal trainer accused of injecting football players with a banned substance and being involved with organised crime, NSW. * Raelene Hardie v The Herald & Weekly Times and Andrew Rule – $250,000 to a strip-club owner, Victoria. * Hamza… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Phillips, in favour of reform, finds it a “considered document which reaffirms the coalition’s commitment to protecting free speech” but argues there is still some way to go. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
The defendant covered his car with posters and placards which made numerous defamatory allegations and parked it outside the house and workplace of the claimant. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
On 8, 9 and 10 May 2012 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the phone hacking privilege against self-incrimination case of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Warby J (b)  Sir Michael Tugendhat (c)  HHJ Richard Parkes QC (d)  Sir David Eady. [read post]