Search for: "Patent Litigation Group" Results 161 - 180 of 4,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2023, 11:30 am by John Ross
Denver in litigation: In fact, it was "patently obvious criminal conduct," and the city can't be held liable for failing to train officers not to do obviously inappropriate things like shooting out of anger. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
The ILR report highlights TPLF in patent litigation as indicative of the litigation investment model’s risks, in general. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am by Florian Mueller
Before I get to its content, two "meta" aspects: Bardehle Pagenberg is both a patent prosecution and litigation firm. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am by Florian Mueller
While the FTC was first to bring a complaint (which the class-action lawyers then piggybacked on), the private litigation is ahead in terms of a request for a preliminary injunction. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:33 pm by Rob Robinson
” Legal teams faced with scoping decisions for litigation and other legal matters often struggle to obtain an accurate list of data sources, particularly as business units and employee groups continually create new sources with emerging applications. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  For those readers outside of the UK, the Patents Court Guide is the tool which organizes how patent litigation is conducted in the UK, from preparing bundles to how to arrange a hearing. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
In nearly all civil and criminal litigation filed in the United States Courts, one party asserts that the allegations leveled against it by another party are patently false, and the result of the litigation may quickly prove that. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am by Florian Mueller
Coincidentally, today is the cutoff date for fact discovery in two disparate antitrust actions involving Activision Blizzard King (ABK): the FTC's adjudicative proceeding (in-house lawsuit) over ABK's acquisition by Microsoft, andthe In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation in the Northern District of California, where Epic Games and Match Group are pursuing a per se violation claim against Google based on its "Project Hug" agreements with game makers. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
That draft can be presented as evidence in any future proceeding.If that claimed benefit was watered down, such as by merely arguing that those advisory opinions would contribute to greater consistency, the pursued objective would no longer justify the restrictions, costs, and delays in question.At an abstract level, this is like the "squeeze" situation in patent litigation, where (depending on claim construction) a patent is either broad and invalid or narrow… [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 1:02 am by Florian Mueller
And let's specifically think of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), a group the Commission particularly tries--but fails--to help. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Here's the unredacted document with lots of exhibits:In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-2981-JD): Unredacted Version of PLaintiffs' Supplemental Brief on Google's Chat ProductionFollow @FOSSpatents on Twitter Follow FOSS Patents on LinkedInLinkedIn is the recommended platform if you prefer to focus on patent topics, while @FOSSpatents increasingly tweets about antitrust.Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed March 8, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 8) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying writ relief in a lawsuit challenging approval of a CEQA-exempt eldercare facility project in Pacific Palisades, an oceanside area of the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
  Normally, collateral estoppel only applies to issues actually litigated, but in the patent context, the Federal Circuit has ruled that it may also apply to non-litigated claims when the differences do not “materially alter the question of invalidity. [read post]