Search for: "Paul v. Sharpe"
Results 161 - 180
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation The departure of Paul Vickers, Trinity Mirror’s Legal Director, did not get much publicity this week. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Sharpe (2nd edition- originally published in 1988) 2008Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law in Canada, 1900-1975 by Constance BackhouseEssays in the History of Canadian Law, Vol. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
Kienitz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
” Paul Morrissey, U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
The trial in Ansari v Knowles which was due to take place last week was settled. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
Paul rightly noted to me, it’s true that a book review is not an editorial, and the two shouldn’t be confused. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:25 am
Sharpe (DC school desegregation)? [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:54 am
When the Supreme Court misrepresented federal law in Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
In other words, the damage to Katz’s reputation were based on the exceptionally sharp comments of Justice Hart. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 10:00 pm
California Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
In California, Samsung has a deadline today for delivering to the court copies of all English-language documents that will be reviewed in camera in connection with the "Patentgate" scandal of improperly-disclosed terms of Apple's highly confidential patent license agreements with Nokia, Ericsson, Sharp, and Philips.Late on Friday, Apple's lawyers sent a letter to Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
Today at 1:30 PM Pacific Time the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold an Apple v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am
The presentation elicited sharp reactions from the audience. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Kiennitz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
