Search for: "People v Word" Results 161 - 180 of 17,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence pointed out: Members of this Court have long held that, "'[a]nytime a State is enjoined by a court from effectuating statutes enacted by representatives of its people, it suffers a form of irreparable injury.'" Maryland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:13 pm
Summary judgment.Granted, there are some new fancy words in the opinion that aren't usually used in your run-of-the-mill employment opinions (e.g., "oppression," "scotched," "conciliate" and the like), plus a new analogy that might perhaps help explain things to some people ("Kuigoua loses this appeal because he changed horses in the middle of the stream. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”)As I have written before, really smart people (including high-level campus leaders) don’t always seem to understand or embrace this crucial distinction between speaking (as is one’s right) and drowning out others who have reserved a place for their own speech. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
People have a right to publicly say "Putin, keep up the good fight against Ukraine" (or, in an earlier era, "Sandinistas, keep up the good fight against the contras") even though that would be aimed at defeating U.S. policy. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Barry Barnett
By coopting people and things that would disrupt their dominance. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Supreme Court streams live audio of oral arguments, New York is way behind the times; the official court rules for coverage of People v. [read post]