Search for: "People v. King (2000)" Results 161 - 180 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m just the king of a kingdom that doesn’t brew beer with corn syrup. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Papa John's Int'l, 227 F.3d 489 (5th Cir. 2000). [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:57 pm
But we would be hard-pressed to top the tale of the 1632 King Gustav II Adolph gold ducat coin and its ultimate guardian, Stephanie Manning, the plaintiff in Manning v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (2000) and expanded by Justice Scalia in Blakely (2004), requiring that facts which increase a statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury, not judge, and beyond reasonable doubt, not just a preponderance. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
Most notably, public school students read from the King James Bible, a translation which the Catholic Church did not recognize. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Past ad regulation was based on a joint statement with the FTC in 2000, directed at advertising of dialaround and other long-distance services, from the days of extensive price competition on rates (which has fallen away with the rise of all-you-can-eat). [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]