Search for: "People v. Ring"
Results 161 - 180
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Boycotts are a form of collective action that allows ordinary people to make their voices heard. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Ring in the Old! [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
Since many people consider Concepcion a poor decision, it just may do the later. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
Judicially, the Supreme Court, in Miller v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:49 am
Hamet v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:48 am
More on Ring v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
There will be rapid adoption of new ethics rules and issuances of ethics opinions related to metadata responsibilities in at least 50% of North American jurisdictions by year-end (I hope - what the heck are the states with zero guidance waiting for - get a clue people and guide your practitioners!) [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
She detailed the jewelry, to include four diamond rings, diamond earrings, other rings, pearls, necklaces, gold items, and some costume jewelry. [read post]
21 May 2007, 5:08 pm
People sometimes asked what did I do with all the money, having a salary for the first time and no expenses. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:31 am
” In State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
” At the Opinionator Blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Simmons v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:03 am
Five years ago, in Thompson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court explained in Riley v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The majority, agreeing with Girvan LJ in the Divisional Court, held that the ECtHR in S and Marper v UK [2009] 48 EHRR 50 was not considering the position of convicted people [2], and confined the principles of the Strasbourg decision to the retention of data obtained from unconvicted persons. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
The Court holds that the use of a narcotics-detection dog to sniff a defendant's body for evidence of a crime qualifies as a search, thus implicating the Fourth Amendment.The case is People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
Activist and lawyer Aislinn Pulley writes about the Chicago reparations ordinance, created in response to Chicago Police Department’s torture ring, and how that could be a model for reparations for enslaved African Americans. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
If that rings a bell, it’s because not even four years ago the Supreme Court struck down an identical Texas law in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:12 am
Some people dream of bigger houses, faster cars, expensive jewelry, extensive travel. [read post]
