Search for: "People v. Smith (1992)"
Results 161 - 180
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
The Dallas Morning News estimated in 1992 that a death penalty case costs Texas $2.3 million, which translates into about $4.2 million today. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Haliye v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
"), people who know the parent can easily find out the child's name. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
In 1992, the D.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Smith Water Prods. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:46 pm
On June 27, 2017, the Fifth Circuit in Brewer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Benedict Mawn v 89. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.97.K5R44 1996 Regenstein Smith, Beverly McQueary. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
The Smith Commission, further Scottish devolution – and religion? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
Farino, 960 F.2d 1217, 1225 (3rd Cir. 1992). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
” Cohen v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In the famous 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
