Search for: "People v. Thomas (1970)"
Results 161 - 180
of 255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
You haven’t tried heroin since the 1970s, much less sold it. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
For a case discussing the distinctions between these two types of warnings in detail, read Thomas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
I agree with Justice Thomas’ that the Court’s main job is to safeguard the constitutional principles established by We the People at earlier points in our history. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
(For a recent reevaluation, see Thomas Colby's essay in Northwestern Law Review.)Taken in their own terms, the coercive Article Five exchange between Congress and the states does not establish the constitutional "quality" of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
Bergeris, supra (quoting Cynthia Callahan & Thomas C. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:03 pm
May 1982. v. 45 (7). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
” Nesselrode was on a jury that had to decide the fate of a 16-year-old accused of starting a fire at a Tuscon hotel in 1970 that killed 29 people. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:21 am
” The analysis is grounded in Supreme Court and federal court decisions dating back to the 1970s, Berrien explained, noting also that it is “rooted in longstanding EEOC policy guidance, dating from the late 1980s adopted under then-Commission Chair Clarence Thomas. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm
See also Thomas v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
In R. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Led by changes in China that accelerated in the years after the late-1970s, China has abandoned the traditional notion of the state’s monopoly on productive property and the necessity of aggregating for the apparatus of the state all power to direct and manage productive assets and the people through which productivity is extracted.[19] Central planning has been abandoned in favor of centralized control of key sectors and central direction of the rest, with control… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
