Search for: "People v. Thomas (1991)"
Results 161 - 180
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Sandra, Thomas noted, “temporized. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:14 am
The updated version released at the meeting builds on longstanding guidance issued by the EEOC over 20 years ago — three separate policy documents were issued in February and July 1987 under Chair Clarence Thomas, and in September 1990 under Chair Evan Kemp. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
Thomas Allen. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Shortly after his 1991 confirmation, Justice Clarence Thomas famously quipped “I ain’t evolving. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Maraist & Thomas C. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Those early surveys brought some attention to the issue, but our collective consciousness was refocused on the issue in 1991, when Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Congress amended Title VII in 1991, codifying the disparate impact test. [read post]
