Search for: "People v. Warner"
Results 161 - 180
of 549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am
Music publisher Warner/Chappell has filed papers indicating the settlement terms in the 'Happy Birthday' case - and has agreed to pay $14m to to a class of “thousands of people and entities” who had paid licensing fees to use the song since 1949 and to end the lawsuit that challenged its copyright to Happy Birthday To You – possibly the world’s most famous song. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
However, the court did find that the approximately 9,200 people who had unauthorized charges adequately allege standing despite getting reimbursed. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Warner/Chappell, 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW (C.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 pm
Only eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Mark reports.* Looking back over this GreeKat shoulder… Part III: The “People’s Car” in the people’s dismayNikos reflects over the recent disgraces in which the poor Volks Wagen has been recently involved. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Looking back over this GreeKat shoulder… Part II: How “lifestyle paternalism” might threaten brandsAfter addressing plain packaging in Part I of this series, Nicos takes a look at another kind of using brands to teach people how to live. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
Judge King in Marya v Warner/Chapell Music determined that the copyright filed by Summy Co. in 1935 granted the rights to the specific piano arrangements of the music, not the music itself. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 10:42 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court applied a three-part test to this question in 2012’s State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Warner Bros. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:41 pm
Kemna, 504 F.3d 705, 711–12 (9th Cir.2007); Warner v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
* It could only happen in America: PETA litigates over macaque selfieOne of those stories that lead people to hate animals. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am
At a post-release rally with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, the Survivor recording of "Eye of the Tiger" was played to 3,000 people —and this immediately produced a furious reaction from a band member. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:32 am
Wood v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:27 pm
No wonder the Warner Music Group wanted to keep the most recognized song in the English language out of there. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:24 am
Talking of events, the next JIPLP-GRUR London seminar, on IP Enforcement in the wake of the IP Enforcement Directive,, is coming up on 8 September: more than 60 people have now registered, but there's still room for more. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:52 pm
AereoFox v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
Merpel tells all.* When the business is over: an IP enthusiast's thoughts from San FranciscoIP conferencing may be hard, and even harder it would be without people (i) who actually attend certain events and (ii) who have enough energy to reflect and draft a report on the conference. [read post]
