Search for: "People v. Wells (1983)" Results 161 - 180 of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
§ 1983 is meant to provide. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
I was recently lucky enough to have Miranda Bernabei, who successfully argued the Smith case, as well as a number of others (see below, Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
What is important here is that even companies that a lot of people think well of, such as State Farm, will do a poor job investigating a claim and unjustly deny a claim. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by SHG
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:33 pm by Anup Surendranath
The United Kingdom, the provision challenged was s.3 of the Representation of the People Act, 1983 - "A convicted person during the time that he is detained in a penal institution in pursuance of his sentence is legally incapable of voting at any parliamentary or local election. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
It is fair to say that due to the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a great many people — certainly including scholars as well as activists — expected this term to see the Supreme Court begin to move against Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm by Cindy Cohn
Terrorists and other criminals already well understand that they can be subject to surveillance during an investigation, so the people who are hurt are the innocent. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
 Back in 1983, in Solem v. [read post]