Search for: "People v. Williams (1994)"
Results 161 - 180
of 321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Sweeney, she said, “Unless your language arts teacher wants to have people speak only when they’ve completely ‘rehearsed’ what to say (as in a play), he will need to allow the children to pause within their turns. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:52 pm
Blasdel, 881 S.W.2d 295, 297 (Tex. 1994); see Dittman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
I can well remember pouring over Michael Walzer’s 1985 lectures on Interpretation and Social Criticism, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s 1994 lectures on Common Law Courts in a Civil-Law System. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
William P. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Valeo, the 1976 decision joined in by such free expression defenders as Justices William J. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
It cautioned against relying on evidence of people's reactions after that date when the series had been extremely successful. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While presumably some people who buy things on Craigslist (or similar Internet sites) are disappointed because they got less than they bargained for, William Marotta might lodge the opposite complaint. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Rev. 121, 158 (1992) (overwarning subjects users to “the perplexing and unpleasant prospect of a regime of warnings that are sometimes incomplete and sometimes too complete”); William H. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Ross v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
”[21] The hemorrhagic colitis caused by E. coli O157:H7 is characterized by severe abdominal cramps, diarrhea that typically turns bloody within twenty-four hours, and sometimes fever.[22] The typical incubation period—which is to say the time from exposure to the onset of symptoms—in outbreaks is usually reported as three to eight days.[23] Infection can occur in people of all ages but is most common in children.[24] The duration of an… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
”[21] The hemorrhagic colitis caused by E. coli O157:H7 is characterized by severe abdominal cramps, diarrhea that typically turns bloody within twenty-four hours, and sometimes fever.[22] The typical incubation period—which is to say the time from exposure to the onset of symptoms—in outbreaks is usually reported as three to eight days.[23] Infection can occur in people of all ages but is most common in children.[24] The duration of an… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Rev. 245 1993-1994).But the great theorizing movements of the 20th centur [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 11:49 am
The federal court decision in Floyd v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 11:49 am
The federal court decision in Floyd v. [read post]
