Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
”) United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
In Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPBiz),Sinorgchem v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
†Pfizer Inc. has announced it will close its $300 million R&D headquarters in New London, Connecticut. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:52 pm
The first, Riegel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Pa. 2012); Steele v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
In re Amgen Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 762 (Ky. 2004) (not a holding, but dictum suggesting broad comment k application).Louisiana: Kinney v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
However, a Maryland federal district court in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
” In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
