Search for: "Price v. State ex rel. Price"
Results 161 - 180
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Note that this is a relatively rare direct appeal from a three-judge district court because it is a congressional redistricting case; more on that later. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:08 am
§ 3730(b)(5), in United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 9:06 pm
That’s the question the Illinois Supreme Court debated during its November term, hearing oral argument in People ex rel. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:53 pm
Just before his ouster, Danon filed a whistleblower action, State of New York ex rel David Danon v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:29 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Ex parte United States, 242 U.S. 27, 37 S.Ct. 72, 61 L.Ed. 129 (1916). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Miss. ex rel. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The FAAAA preempts state laws that “relate to” the prices, routes, or services of a motor carrier “with respect to the transportation of property. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
The California Supreme Court has announced its decision in People ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Affirming a state appellate court’s decision overturning the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to the trucking company, the state high court left it to the trial court to determine whether the company in fact misclassified its drivers (People ex rel Harris v Pan Anchor Transportation, Inc, July 28, 2014, Chin, M). [read post]
