Search for: "QUARRELS v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
 Absent the violation of some external norm, as in a case like United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Reviving a discharged mechanic’s FMLA and ADA claims, the Tenth Circuit concluded the employee established a genuine issue of material fact as to whether his employer’s stated reasons for firing him — a safety violation and a (related) quarrel with a coworker over the incident — were pretextual, particularly in light of management’s oft-stated annoyance with the employee’s need for intermittent leave. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
I have no quarrel whatsoever with the need for more focused analysis. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Bexis
  So we’ve decided to take the plunge.We don’t have much quarrel with Dean Chemerinsky’s initial observation that the existing regime for preemption and prescription drug product liability litigation, fashioned by the trilogy of Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm by Vikram Raghavan
They had no particular recorded reaction to the Attorney General’s categorical statement that government had no quarrel with the High Court’s judgment. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  There’s also a “best evidence rule” argument, but we’re not quarrelling with that. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:29 am by David Friedman
 feud (n.) c.1300, fede "enmity, hatred, hostility," northern English and Scottish; perhaps from an unrecorded Old English word or else from Old French fede, from Old High German fehida "contention, quarrel, feud," from Proto-Germanic *faihitha noun of state from adj. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
As a preliminary matter, I can’t help but reflect for a moment on how we got to where we are: Most people, I think, do not have a quarrel with the bottom-line conclusions and results. [read post]