Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice" Results 161 - 180 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
On the merits, this should be an easy call… By now, such blatant discrimination should be presumed to be unconstitutional, and the Justice Department should finally say so. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
Burr (per Chief Justice Marshall, sitting as Circuit Justice); the Nixon tapes case; and Nixon v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Department of Justice, as well as the FBI, made an official acknowledgement that almost every examiner in the FBI’s elite forensic unit provided testimony that was inherently flawed in nearly all trials wherein they offered evidence against defendants in criminal cases for more than 20 years prior to 2000. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also held 5-4 on Friday in Currier v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:28 pm
"We regret," the statement said, "that the department didn't catch the 2006 law when the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:11 am by Stewart Baker
In the news roundup, I try to count votes after the Supreme Court argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am by Felix Mikolasch
Here, the ECJ departs clearly from the position of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona (para. 105). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm by Tobias Thienel
Oellers-Frahm (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:31 am by Molly Joyce
The Justices in Jennings were quick to acknowledge that even if Broome did not violate the SCA, her alleged actions weren’t necessarily acceptable either. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:47 am by Stewart Baker
The panel then discusses recent charges brought by the Justice Department, and two arrests, aimed at China’s alleged attempt to harass dissidents living in the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
We think there is something much too quick—if not seriously wrong—in the use of comparative law exemplified in Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Buffington. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
The court’s discussion is too thorough for me to do it justice, but two things stand out. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am by Richard Hunt
In the world of physical spaces “accessibility” is defined by the standards published by the Department of Justice. [read post]