Search for: "Robert Johnson v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Iqbal is a 2009 decision of the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) that may have an impact on the standard applied to motions to dismiss in state courts with rules that are modeled on the federal rules. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  It did the same thing back in 2007 in State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Rakove sets out to solve in Kennedy, Johnson, and the Nonaligned World is how to explain the remarkable transformation in the relationship between the United States and much of the postcolonial world over the course of the 1960s. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at McWilliams comes from Robert Johnson at ACSblog, who maintains that an “independent mental health expert would have changed what the court heard about Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:40 am
Waxman couldn't do it but there are two reasons why this seems not so damning: 1) As to the U.S., even in Johnson v. [read post]