Search for: "Robertson v Wells"
Results 161 - 180
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:54 am
This is despite the decisions in Robertson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:06 am
In US v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
It’s well worth a read. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:47 am
Last week’s arguments in US v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
I suspect the constitutionality of such a court depends on that as well. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
See Robertson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Robertson, supra, 96 Cal.App.4th 884, and Salenga v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
Chatham County Hospital Authority, 145 Ga.App. 113, 115, 243 S.E.2d 269 (1978); Robertson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Robertson v Wells, 95 AD3d 862, 863; Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 837). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
"Well, I have a pretty good guess why both the defense as well as the prosecution were willing to refer to the garage as a church; namely, because it was. [read post]
Beyond Users' Rights: Supreme Court Entrenches Technological Neutrality as a New Copyright Principle
16 Jul 2012, 12:24 am
The majority of the court states: In our view, the Board's conclusion that a separate, "communication" tariff applied to downloads of musical works violates the principle of technological neutrality, which requires that the Copyright Act apply equally between traditional and more technologically advanced forms of the same media: Robertson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:50 am
“[V]ery serious violent offences” can outweigh an Art 8 claim “even if they were committed by a minor”. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Last, you may want to consider the Second Circuit’s decision in Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
Circuit’s reasoning in Gul v. [read post]
