Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers"
Results 161 - 180
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2010, 5:59 am
Attorney Rodger Lofton was hired to represent Denise Maxey on her personal injury claim on a contingent fee basis. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm
Practices Assocs. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Lord Rodger agrees with Lords Hope and Walker, with nothing further. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
Lewis, and the 5th District’s decision earlier this year in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
However, in S & Marper v UK (2008) 48 EHRR 50, the European Court of Human Rights robustly disagreed. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Rodgers v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
The Sacco defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal [*2]malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, LLC, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018; Ferrigno v Jaghab, Jaghab & Jaghab, P.C., 152 AD3d 650, 652; Atiencia v Pinczewski, 148 AD3d 860, 861). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Rodger illustrated the principle in Rahman [2008] HL: “Suppose that, knowing what A is like and that he tends to carry a gun, B contemplates that A may take a gun and use it in the course of the attack on the victim. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Errol Morris is to be commended for his willingness to subject the Jeffrey MacDonald case to his customary rigorous examination. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The judgment was given by Lord Rodger. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 2:58 pm
Sattgast (Tribal Sovereignty; State Taxation) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2022.html Rodgers v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
