Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 161 - 180
of 68,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
Defazio, 2007 WL 496813 (D. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 11:45 am
Wright, George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ask What’s Next in Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:08 am
Nguyen, Faculty of Law, Lund University addresses Competition Rules in the TRIPS Agreement: The CFI's Ruling in Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Daniel Sokol Ruchit Patel, Cleary Gottlieb explains English Court of Appeal’s Judgment in Cooper Tire and Ors v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:08 am
Nguyen, Faculty of Law, Lund University addresses Competition Rules in the TRIPS Agreement: The CFI's Ruling in Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry… [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829; [2010] WLR (D) 99 “The concern of s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is limited to the valuation of property and does not extend to the realisation of property, so that it does not have to be assumed that a beneficial interest in property has to be sold separately from the property and, for the purposes of making a confiscation order, the correct basis on which to proceed is to take into account the due proportion of the… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:48 am
Maidment v Attwood and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 998; [2012] WLR (D) 220 “Where a minority shareholder had brought a petition under section 994 of the Companies Act alleging that remuneration paid to a director of a now insolvent company in liquidation was excessive and therefore unfairly prejudicial, there was no basis in the statutory provisions or in principle or in authority to impose a requirement for diligence on shareholders in regards to the… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:41 am
Places for People Homes Ltd v Sharples; A2 Dominion Homes Ltd v Godfrey [2011] EWCA Civ 813; [2011] WLR (D) 233 “The provisions of the insolvency legislation did not fetter the power of the county court to make a possession order for non-payment of rent against a bankrupt assured tenant or an assured tenant protected by a debt relief order (“DRO”) made under Part 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (inserted by section 108(1) of and… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:11 am
National Union, the Delaware Superior Court explained that Stillwater had seized upon the Court’s 2019 opinion in Solera Holdings v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 904; [2011] WLR (D) 265 “Any contractual arrangement contained in a tenancy (or a prior agreement ), which imposed an obligation on an existing or prospective guarantor of the tenant’s liabilities to guarantee the liabilities of a future assignee, would be void by reason of section 25(1) of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:01 am
Ce billet cherche à mettre à jour — sans le réécrire en entier — celui que j'ai publié en juillet 2017 : Affelnet : le logiciel d'affectation dans les lycées à Paris bugue sévèrement pour la deuxième année consécutive. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
Les travaux sont autorisés, mais les décisions sont assorties de conditions, d'où les recours. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- In April, in Xlear, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm
The District Court granted the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings,... [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:25 pm
District Court Overrules Defendants' Objections to Magistrate's Report on Lost Profits By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 89 “Where a partner entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all aspects of the firm's professional indemnity insurance failed to fulfil his obligations, a liability in damages to a client, for which the firm's professional indemnity insurer had refused indemnity, was a liability to be [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:33 pm
If you'd like to catch up and read some of the news coverage and court documents, see the Washington v. [read post]
