Search for: "STATE v. ACKERMAN"
Results 161 - 180
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Dynkowski, Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski P.C., Cleveland; Thomas L. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
Feel free to contact me at Ackerman Law Office if you have questions or want to hire me. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
We the People, Vol. 3: The Civil Rights RevolutionBruce Ackerman (2014, Belknap Press) Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale University, focuses on the events and laws that shaped the civil rights era and helped to end Jim Crow, starting with the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
”(Ackerman & Fishkin, Deliberation Day, p. 6, quoting from Delli Carpini & Keeter’s comprehensive survey.) [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
The American people can decide to constitute the idea of a Christian and democratic state as the telos of the US, and nothing in Ackerman’s theory can stop them. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:16 am
Ackerman argues further that anti-humiliation is the premise behind United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
’” Like Ackerman, Chief Justice Rehnquist excoriated the dissent for “relying upon the now-discredited decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm
It based its decision on a number of similar cases, including Hoglund v State Farm 148 Ill.2d 272 (1992) and Gibbs v Madison Mutual 242 Ill.App3d. 147 (1993). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:57 pm
But then Ackerman’s “originalism,” according to which public deliberation takes the place of the Article V process, founders on ambiguity as to what counts as an amendment. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Hood v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied cert in Cotterman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm
Ackerman explains the Amendment’s legitimacy on the basis of President Johnson’s 1868 capitulation to a non-Article-V process, confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1873. [read post]
