Search for: "STATE v. McCANN" Results 161 - 180 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland for an example from our past and the persistent operation of s. 62 of the Housing Act 1966 in light of cases such as Connors, McCann and Kay for what looks certain to be a repeat performance in the future unless some legislative change is… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:22 pm by Michael McCann
McCann, Vermont Law School- Author of American Needle v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This followed a lengthy inquiry, taking evidence from claimants (the McCanns, Max Mosley), defendants (newspapers and other publishers) and lawyers. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In McCann v UK, which preceded Cosic, the ECtHR not surprisingly found that the rule in Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk similarly breached Article 8 because of the lack of procedural safeguards (see especially paras [53]-[54]). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:02 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOpinion Date: 8/11/10Cite: Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Dan Frith
The case, decided this week by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, is Mayer Hoffman McCann, PC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
Responses to the Proposal In the report by Professor Mullis and Dr Scott “Something Rotten in the State of English Libel Law? [read post]