Search for: "Scales v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 1:12 am
8thCirc.jpg As long as a proper foundation is establish, a party may introduce photographs of tangible objects (a box of ammunition, identification cards with the defendant's name, and an electronic scale), which had been seized and destroyed before trial, instead of the objects themselves, in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:35 am by Fakhimi & Associates
As Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Houman Fakhimi understands, embezzlement, under Coliseum case widens; six are charged, By Andrew Blankstein, Paul Pringle and Rong-Gong Lin II, Los Angeles Times More Blog Entries: United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent is assigned to The United States of America, represented by the Secretary of Commerce. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm by David Markus
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Biegalski (Doctrine of Claim Preclusion; State Taxation; Utilities)Guardado v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
Circuit handed down its decision in the most recent iteration of Al Bahlul v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
  This was recognised by the last Government’s Working Group on Libel Reform (discussed in a post by one of its members Gavin Phillipson and by the Canadian Supreme Court when it sought to formulate a public interest defence last year (in Grant v. [read post]