Search for: "Sears Roebuck "
Results 161 - 180
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:30 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:17 pm
Sears Roebuck Inc., 2012 U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:17 am
Sears Roebuck Inc., 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, 2012 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
The other day we posted about Von Downum v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:45 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, slip op. at 2 (7th Cir. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 3:41 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 358 So.2d 926, 930 (La.1978); see also La. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 18 (1994). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 15 (1994). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., the Michigan Supreme Court held that installers of an electric dryer owed no duty to the homeowners with respect to an uncapped natural gas line that had been left by the previous homeowners. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corp. have issued a large product recall for dehumidifiers which can overheat, smoke, melt and catch on fire. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:11 pm
Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with retailers Sears Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation, announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
June 13, 2012) - authored by Judge Easterbrook (joined by Judges Posner and Bauer), the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants a shareholders' derivative suit alleging that Sears Roebuck & Co. violated Section 8 by having on its Board of Directors two individuals who also served on the boards of Sears competitors. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
William Dougherty, a 40-year repairman who worked for Sears Roebuck was fired after getting into three traffic accidents even though younger employees with driving problems kept their jobs. [read post]
