Search for: "Sears and Roebuck and Co."
Results 161 - 180
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am
Co. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, 2012 U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:13 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 252 N.J. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Sears Roebuck and Co., no. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:22 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co. is already famous for the suggestion made by plaintiffs’ counsel in oral argument that the Seventh Circuit panel’s three male judges poll their wives to see if they agreed whether the possibility that a stainless steel clothes dryer contained non-stainless components made them fearful of rust damage to their laundry. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 24; N.J.S.A. 56:8-19. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:20 am
The Court vacated and remanded the lower court’s decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 08-1590, 2008 WL 4709500 (7th Cir. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 365 Md. 67, 775 A.2d 1218 (2001). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 11:16 am
The California Court of Appeal just affirmed a trial court’s denial of class certification for Sears, Roebuck and Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
He devised the plan that made Sears, Roebuck Co. the first publicly owned retail operation in the world, helped convince Woodrow Wilson to pass the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and became a power player in the world of Wall Street finance at a time when Jews were considered outsiders. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:13 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.) has nothing to do with punitive damages. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:36 am
In two successive decisions, Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 274 NLRB 230 (1985) and in E.I. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
June 13, 2012) - authored by Judge Easterbrook (joined by Judges Posner and Bauer), the Seventh Circuit reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants a shareholders' derivative suit alleging that Sears Roebuck & Co. violated Section 8 by having on its Board of Directors two individuals who also served on the boards of Sears competitors. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
§ 1407, Unopposed by Class Action Plaintiffs, but Orders Class Actions Transferred to Eastern District of Wisconsin, Where none of the Class Actions had been Filed Twenty-three (23) class actions were filed in 18 federal district courts against numerous defendants, including inter alia Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Co., Kawasaki Motors, and The Kohler Co.; the class action complaints alleged “manufacturers of lawnmowers… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:32 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 18 (1994). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co, No. 143329. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789, 804 (7th Cir. 2005).Xodus simply failed to introduce enough convincing evidence that Wackenhut was aware of his religion which provides an important lesson to most any plaintiff in employment cases: you must let the employer know of your protected class! [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:36 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., In Re Walgreen Co. [read post]
