Search for: "See v. Com."
Results 161 - 180
of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
Lawrence… Lengthy and good discussion of whether police can enter an apartment when they see drugs inside, under the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement, in the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:48 am
So let’s see what happened in the courts of appeals… Civil. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 11:15 am
Australian cricket captain Ricky Ponting has lodged an application (set for hearing in the Federal Court on 8 February 2008) claiming misleading and deceptive conduct against the operator of a website which described itself as "the official Ricky Ponting site": Ricky Thomas Ponting v Kevin Leonard Consulting Pty Limited (ACN 087 382 858) & Anor (also see Computerworld story) It is not clear why Ricky Ponting has chosen litigation rather than the domain name… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am
They don’t worry about that stuff in the courts of appeals, either, so let’s take a look to see what’s happened there… In State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
& COM. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
See also Dunson v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:33 pm
Each “Count” # corresponds to the same Exhibit # … which means you can use @Law360‘s digital docket to look them up. https://law360.com/newyork-vs-tru [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
See DePuy Spine, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
And then we’ll see what how much vitality the Crawford legacy really has left. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
See Cipes v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The case was State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
In the courts of appeals, they always have oral arguments, so let’s see how those turned out… In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
Again, though, that is because judges always see those costs; they don’t see the costs imposed by an illegal search when it proves fruitless. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
Again, though, that is because judges always see those costs; they don’t see the costs imposed by an illegal search when it proves fruitless. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
” Let me see if I understand this. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:41 am
See, e.g., Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
The latest news from Chicago: http://www.abc57.com/news/crime/Chicago-mother-loses-four-children-to-gunshots-188600261.html Where is the ethics issue here? [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am
Last summer, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
On Monday, I talked about State v. [read post]
