Search for: "Service Employees v. Foundation" Results 161 - 180 of 1,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, the American Bar Foundation and the Texas Bar Foundation, Ms. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
In fact, in its 2012 decision in Knox v Service Employees, the Court had noted that Abood was “something of an anomaly,” the Court pointed out here. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Salesforce qualified as an “access software provider” because “the support Salesforce provided Backpage involved the provision of technological capabilities—specifically, software that allowed Backpage employees to analyze and digest customer data as well as applications providing for the transmission of both internal employee communications and external customer outreach and support. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Marty Lederman
 Or consider another example from the Court's own Free Exercise jurisprudence:  In Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:09 am by Karen Ainslie
The extension of bargaining council agreements has come under scrutiny in Free Market Foundation v Minister of Labour & Others [2016] ZAGPPHC 266. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm by Christopher S. Lockman
Below are updates regarding the employee benefit cases before the Court previously mentioned in our Advisory: IBM v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:57 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee worked for Professional Transit Management, Ltd, (PTM), which provided management services to the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA). [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:03 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[iv]See Education Law §390.3[v] When it was established in 1964 then professional employees could continue in their respective State retirement system or elect to participate in ORP. [read post]