Search for: "Sharp v. Johnson" Results 161 - 180 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
  She used a wonderful ‘Celia Johnson disguised voice’ and laughed a lot. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On Monday 21 May 2012 the libel trial of Miller v Associated Newspapers will begin before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
On 11 May 2012, Sharp J handed down judgment in the case of King v Grundon. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am by Graeme Hall
David Allen Green, writing in the New Statesman, remarks that this Inquiry is a boost for democracy as it gives a voice to those who have been at the sharp end of press intrusion – normally all to easily ignored and silenced by papers. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
They've developed alternative methods for packing and cooling that reduce and eliminate the use of water.Trevor V. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Below Gabor Rona has a sharp response to my earlier post on Charlie Savage’s story on the latest round of Johnson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Marie Louise
  General EU – India agreement in WTO dispute raises bar for EU drug seizures (IP Watch) EU: CJEU rules on repackaging of pharma goods: Joined Cases C-400/09 and C-207/10 Orifarm and Paranova v Merck Sharp Dohme (Class 46) (IPKat) EU: Ophtal v Oftal Cusi- General Court upholds finding of no likelihood of confusion for identical goods in T-160/09 (Class 46) EU: The holiday is over: a close reading of the opinion in Medeva: Joined Cases C? [read post]