Search for: "Sides v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 26,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
If the judge did not dismiss the potential juror for cause at that point, either side could use a peremptory challenge. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
If the judge did not dismiss the potential juror for cause at that point, either side could use a peremptory challenge. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
If the judge did not dismiss the potential juror for cause at that point, either side could use a peremptory challenge. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm by Thomas Berg
(Posted one day late) Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
"Taxpayers funding lawyers on one side and taxpayers funding on the other side, to be decided by courts funded by taxpayers, including but not limited to the present appeal. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Ultimately, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that Neil’s side deals were “null and void” (Kavanaugh v Kavanaugh, 200 AD3d 1568 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]