Search for: "State Highway Department v. Wells" Results 161 - 180 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Private Cost Increase Choice, as well as highway maintenance, as I discussed in Are Private Tolls More Efficient Than Public Tolls? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles is binding on this court. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee at the center of the dispute was a light equipment operator for the city’s highway department. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm by Regan Zambri Long
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:29 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 9 Fla. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Constitution has been read by the Court to prohibit suit against a state (e.g., Texas) or a state-level entity (e.g., the Texas Department of Criminal Justice or the California Highway Patrol) in federal court without the state’s consent, the so-called Ex Parte Young doctrine permits suing state officials charged with enforcement responsibilities as long as they are sued not for money damages but for prospective injunctive relief. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
Box 789, Lake Pleasant" and that the correspondence, which was addressed to either "Route 8, Lake Pleasant" or "Route 8, Speculator," would likely not have reached his home without the inclusion of his post office box number since "Route 8 is a large expanse of state highway in Lake Pleasant and beyond. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am by Lovechilde
And that’s how we invested in a rail system and a highway system. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Well, at first MADD and various state legislatures decided to find a way to get drunk drivers off the highways RIGHT NOW — and not be diverted by any technicalities like, well, the Constitution. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:27 am by Lawrence Taylor
Well, at first MADD and various state legislatures decided to find a way to get drunk drivers off the highways RIGHT NOW — and not be diverted by any technicalities like, well, the Constitution. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am by Kevin Kaufman
First, plaintiffs argue that the provision fails the ambiguity test under Pennhurst State Sch. v. [read post]