Search for: "State of Cal. v. Super. Ct."
Results 161 - 180
of 400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
Ct. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Super. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
Perhaps for super good reasons, lest there be an ability to kick out (at least potentially) your opponents on the legislative board.Those are my thoughts.Even though, again, at the outset, I thought that Justice Sanchez was definitely right, and that there's no way that someone expressly elected for a two-year term could possibly be allowed to stay on for a full four years. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Dep’t Super. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
State Bar of Cal., No. 3:20-cv-06442-LB (N.D. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Super. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm
" ACLU of RI cooperating attorney Labinger stated: "The internet can be full of intemperate and uncomfortable discussions. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Superior Ct., 109 Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:14 pm
Cal. 2005); Doe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Ct. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 159, 171.) [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:01 am
A lawsuit currently pending in a state court in California, Scott v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:30 am
Ct. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
Ct., 51 Cal.4th 310 (2011). [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
Super. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Cal. 2004) Norris v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
BC461182 (Cal. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am
Super. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
Super. [read post]
