Search for: "State v. Bird"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 11:26 am
John Diehl lives in Washington State but owns eight vacant lots in Crescent City. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
A recent Law.com article notes that Justice Scalia mentioned Oscar the Grouch in his dissenting opinion in Washington State Grange v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am
Murphy v Certain2023 NY Slip Op 02978Decided on June 06, 2023Appellate Division, First Department “The court properly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:04 am
The case is EEOC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:39 pm
Complaint Apple v Amazon App Store// [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:24 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
Wingtat Game Bird Packers (1993) Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:03 am
Supreme Court will rule in the Bilski v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Kevin Miller, a Partner with Alston & Bird and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this post discussing the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:58 am
American Forest Resource Council v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:35 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
The Supreme Court’s holding in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
