Search for: "State v. Coca" Results 161 - 180 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:05 pm
The case of BCI Coca-Cola Co. of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am by James Kachmar
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
The Paris Criminal Court of Appeal awarded a total amount of 13 million euros and 12 months’ imprisonment in the case of D.M. v APP, Microsoft, Sacem and others, available in French language here.Monday Miscellany and Sunday SurprisesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 158 [week ending Sunday 30 July] The right of communication to the public ... in a chart I From Coca-Cola Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar: big deal or no deal? [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
In Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721, [19], the Full Bench of the Federal Court held: Use ‘as a trade mark’ is use of the mark as a ‘badge of origin’ in the sense that it indicates a connection in the course of trade between goods and the person who applies the mark to the goods ... [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
That was the question -- the so-called "cat's paw" liability issue -- in BCI Coca-Cola v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
In 1999 Schweppes sold the rights to the name to the Coca-Cola Company in 13 EU Member States (including the UK), keeping their rights in 18 other countries in the EU, among which was Spain. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca Cola, involving standing and preclusion, respectively. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]