Search for: "State v. Coca" Results 161 - 180 of 491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
The Paris Criminal Court of Appeal awarded a total amount of 13 million euros and 12 months’ imprisonment in the case of D.M. v APP, Microsoft, Sacem and others, available in French language here.Monday Miscellany and Sunday SurprisesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 158 [week ending Sunday 30 July] The right of communication to the public ... in a chart I From Coca-Cola Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar: big deal or no deal? [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
In Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721, [19], the Full Bench of the Federal Court held: Use ‘as a trade mark’ is use of the mark as a ‘badge of origin’ in the sense that it indicates a connection in the course of trade between goods and the person who applies the mark to the goods ... [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
That was the question -- the so-called "cat's paw" liability issue -- in BCI Coca-Cola v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca Cola, involving standing and preclusion, respectively. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal. 2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) (soft drink bottle); Henningsen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
In fact, in the cross-motions for summary judgment, the claimants stated that the use of a trade mark as a verb, i.e. [read post]