Search for: "State v. Coca" Results 161 - 180 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 5:02 am
Of course, 'the court and its personnel' are usually allowed recipients but that phrase does not mean 'the court, its personnel, and the public.' Otherwise, the recipe for Coca-Cola or any other highly private information could be blurted out in open court. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  More systematic research bears this out in some ways: recognition/recall is better; to the point that consumers shorten Chevrolet to Chevy and Coca-Cola to Coke. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
Coke defends against opposition to 'ZERO' trade marksEmma Perot explores Coca-Cola's strategy in defending its ZERO trade marks in a recent USPTO case. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
According to Han Beauty Inc v Alberto-Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, (Fed. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Design patents in the modern era are seldom directed to fashionable carpet designs or classic Coca-Cola bottles; they are often sought, and issued, for relatively mundane design features. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm by Ad Law Defense
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 McKenna: sometimes it’s just a state of uncertainty (difficulty in understanding) v. false actual belief. [read post]