Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 161 - 180 of 4,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2013, 7:18 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
   In the Matter of the Tenure Hearing of Jennifer O'Brien, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket No. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and other decisions. the Appellate Division affirm the lower court's ruling. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, and other decisions. the Appellate Division affirm the lower court's ruling. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division then pointed out that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has opined that Title VII "does not protect an employee from all retaliation, but only retaliation that produces an injury or harm. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
State Policy v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2013 NY Slip Op 01117, Appellate Division, Third Department at http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2013/02/a-foil-request-seeking-names-of-public.html ** The First Department also noted the decision in New York Veteran Police Assn. v New York City Police Dept. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Some limitations to obtaining information pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information LawMiller v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2014 NY Slip Op 07742, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that the New York State Division of Human Rights did not violate the State’s Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] when it denied Jerald Miller’sFOIL… [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
In the absence of such prejudice, I believe that the trial court acted within its discretion, and, accordingly, I respectfully dissent.In Jeannine Porod v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The decision at first instance The matter was tried in the Chancery Division of the High Court before Arnold J. [read post]