Search for: "State v. Cross #2"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Most of the week’s proceedings, including the deposition of al-Darbi, were held in classified or otherwise closed sessions, but the court addressed a number of administrative and logistical matters in open sessions on July 31, Aug. 2 and Aug. 4. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, 2011 Mont. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
See R. 2:12-3(b). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
He appealed and the United States cross-appealed; the case was then briefed and argued. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:49 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a 2 to 1 decision, vacated the 2011 Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (aka the Transport Rule). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Chang v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
A.M. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Webster v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:52 pm
Cross Reference. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
” At 2:09 p.m., Fair’s emailed response to Russo’s 1:53 p.m. email confirming full agreement was “Ok. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:03 am
The issue of waiver appears: Cisco further contends dependent claim 2 makes clear that claim 1 must encompass “cross-correlated signal information” that is cross-correlated after it is received. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 6:21 am
In Barbe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
") AC32608 - State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:17 am
SIJ petitioners in the state of Washington are protected by an injunction issued in the related case Galvez v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:48 am
There are three questions now before the Supreme Court: (1) whether a formalist or functionalist analysis governs the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States; (2) whether qualified immunity may be granted or denied based on facts – such as the victim’s legal status – unknown… [read post]
