Search for: "State v. D. A. R." Results 161 - 180 of 16,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In our view, the trial judge’s reasons are sufficient in law (see R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
These numerous decisions are thoroughly researched and reviewed by Judge Terrence R. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Eric B. Meyer
Bob Casey, D-Pa., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm by Carl Shusterman
  One of these briefs was submitted by 6 Senators, 3 Republicans and 3 Democrats who were all in the Senate when the CSPA was enacted in 2002: Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), John McCain (R-AZ), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Charles Schumer (D-NY) and former Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
Background On 17 February 2022, the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (‘USOPC’) designated the EU in its IR no. 1645605 for the sign ‘TEAM USA’. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal construed “deliberately” as including “recklessly” and so found that recklessness with both a subjective and objective element, as described in R v G and Anor [2003] UKHL 50, would be sufficient to establish that concealment was deliberate. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm by Michael Oykhman
However, common law, such as R v Ruzic and R v Ryan notes that the list of excluded offences under section 17 is unconstitutional as that risks convicting morally innocent individuals. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]