Search for: "State v. Doll"
Results 161 - 180
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
Mattel Inc. , a case pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Mattel, maker of the Barbie doll, asserted that a former employee, Carter Bryant, began drawing designs for the Bratz doll - made by his new employer MGA Entertainment ("MGA") - while he was still employed by Mattel. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:45 pm
Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am
This has been repeatedly confirmed both by local courts and the ECtHR (P v Poland [2012] ECHR 1853). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:35 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:57 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:03 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Turner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
MGA further stated that it intends to appeal any amount of awarded damages at the end of the case. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 9:26 am
Super 8 Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:21 pm
The case cite is Colliander v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:09 am
and John Doll on state of the patent system [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:08 am
MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
See, e.g., Theer v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:57 am
Docket: 08-853 Title: Zessar v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
The key study was conducted by Sir Richard Doll in 1955, which showed the association but only among those who had been overexposed in the early years of the manufacturing plant.[9] There was no causal inference claimed, and Doll had not controlled for smoking histories. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
