Search for: "State v. Frye"
Results 161 - 180
of 473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
The US Supreme Court, in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 pm
Florida follows the standard for the admission of scientific evidence announced in Frye v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 3:05 pm
Florida follows the standard for the admission of scientific evidence announced in Frye v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
In fact, Lafler and Frye remind me of one of the Court decisions from that era, Henderson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
It was only in 1971, in Santobello v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:35 am
Ho v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia case called Frye v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
United States and the Maryland case of Reed v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:04 am
Harvey, 151 N.J. 117, 169-70 (1997) (citing Frye v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
The plaintiff in Sean R. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
As in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
LeGrand, a murder case in which the trial judge last year refused to admit expert testimony (PDF) on the reliability of eyewitness identifications, and further held that such evidence is unreliable under the "general acceptance" standard set forth in Frye v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm
It has long been the law that New York State follows the Frye standard for scientific evidence and expert testimony, in that the same is required to be generally accepted in its relevant field (see Frye v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
