Search for: "State v. Painter" Results 161 - 180 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Stewart Baker shared the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring an interview with Chris Painter, former lead cyber diplomat at the State Department. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am by Karina Lytvynska
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:41 am by Howard Knopf
However, simply because Rains expressed his idea before Molea and found commercial success and critical acclaim for doing so, does not mean that Molea or any other painter is forever prohibited from independently creating an expression of crumpled paper in still life form. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:53 pm by Ray Dowd
It appears as if artworks that once belonged to the art dealer and publisher Alfred Flechtheim are hanging in dozens of institutions such as the Ludwig Museum in Cologne, the Bavarian State Collection of Paintings in Munich, the State-Gallery Stuttgart or the Berlin State Museums. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am by Sheppard Mullin
 In his thirty-two page decision, Judge Marrero compared fashion designers to painters and noted how creativity for both is dependant upon using color as "an indispensable medium" that "plays a unique role. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:05 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
Shortly after this Statute’s enactment, our state’s Supreme Court in Painter v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm by tjsllibrary
Considerable emphasis is placed upon the twentieth century, especially the period since the 1972 Furman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reject of three possible approaches: (1) solely determined by national law, given that it’s mandatory and normative; (2) informed by relevant state practice; (3) synonymous with three-step test. [read post]