Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 161 - 180
of 15,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 11:00 pm
In the case of Healey v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
October 2, 2023 | Alan B. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The Court of Appeal noted, in this respect, that the decision in Budvar was an isolated judgment, and that other decisions of EU courts were inconsistent with its reasoning, including the decision of the EUIPO Board of Appeal in Cristianini v Ghibli, Case R 1299/2007-2, in which the Board interpreted the reference in the legislation to a "later registered mark" as simply requiring that the later mark must have been registered for a period of five years, without… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
In their particular case, the Patentee argued that a summary table provided in the description represented a shorthand for stating all the disclosed combinations individually. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
Freedom Patents LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
As such, RBKC had failed to meet the R v Camden LBC ex parte Mohammed (1998) 30 HLR 315 (Admin) criteria, or the statutory code of guidance at para 15.26. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
These numerous decisions are thoroughly researched and reviewed by Judge Terrence R. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
R. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:17 am
The Court of Appeal considered the same case law as the lower courts, with the addition of SC, CB and 8 children v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others [2021] UKSC 26. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
James B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The EUIPO issued a refusal of the IR based on lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeal construed “deliberately” as including “recklessly” and so found that recklessness with both a subjective and objective element, as described in R v G and Anor [2003] UKHL 50, would be sufficient to establish that concealment was deliberate. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
”(B) Service by e-mail. [read post]
