Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 161 - 180 of 4,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
“In particular, the transaction-processing costs on which the Board based the base component have nearly halved. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
” The Second Amendment returns to the Supreme Court Less than two years after their landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Such an outcome equally produces unpredictability as to the anticipated effect and application of the forum law. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am by Sasha Volokh
This is a principle that goes back to West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Cases 591 [added to Ch. 2, § 2.8] (excepting financial professionals under Labor Code § 2783(d)(1) from application of the ABC test to determine employment status did not violate equal protection) Schaan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
[iv]           See, for example, dismissal of claims against the boards of Cisco Cisco-order.pdf (dandodiary.com) and Qualcomm Qualcomm-opinion.pdf (dandodiary.com) [v]           See, for example, Enviva Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:15 am by Emily Vaisa
The Third Circuit’s Deliberations The case currently pending before the Third Circuit, Johnson v. [read post]