Search for: "State v. Sykes"
Results 161 - 180
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2014, 10:30 am
So held the unsurprising decision in Denison v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:57 am
(Sykes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
Durant v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:56 am
” Sykes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:10 pm
Sykes (American Journal of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:32 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
Affirming summary judgment in favor of the restaurant chain, the appeals court observed that while her employment was automatically terminated when she failed to show up for work after a three-week paid vacation, in the absence of evidence that she was involuntarily relieved of a job that she’d expressed a desire to keep, the administrative termination could not be considered a materially adverse employment action (Andrews v CBOCS West, Inc, February 14, 2014, Sykes, D). [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
(Judge Sykes took this view in her recent decision for the Seventh Circuit in Korte v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Rather, in his October 10, 2013 decision in Sykes v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:58 pm
Sykes, 136 S.W.3d 635, 640 (Tex. 2004) (stating that "a dismissal constitutes a final determination on the merits of the matter actually decided"); Ritchey v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 11:19 am
Sykes, 53 Cal. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
[1] The case is captioned Sykes v Mel Harris and Associates, LLC, et al., US Dist Ct SDNY 09-Civ 8486, Chin, J., September 4, 2012, and the opinion is currently available on Westlaw at 2012 WL 3834802 and in the New York Law Journal here [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
She discusses many other examples as well, including Sykes v. [read post]
