Search for: "State v. Waterhouse"
Results 161 - 180
of 310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 8:26 am
Highlighting the rather incongruous state of Title VII case law, the Evans court then reiterated that discrimination based on gender-nonconformity is actionable sex-discrimination, under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:01 pm
In a case arising in Western Pennsylvania, Prowel v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
The retailer pointed to Oncale v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Supreme Court’s ruling on a claim of discrimination by “sex stereotyping” in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:02 am
Title VII already rejects gender stereotypes under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 2:31 pm
McVerry on September 13 in Prowel v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
The plaintiffs argue that their cases are thus analogous to Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 pm
Zarda / Bostock v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:49 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:54 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
The Court has agreed to decide “whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:56 am
The Price Waterhouse conundrum. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 7:01 am
He therefore stated a claim for sex discrimination. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:31 am
” The court also found that the employee stated plausible claims for sexual orientation discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation based on allegations of many discriminatory remarks, exclusion from meetings and projects, and termination soon after he complained (Philpott v. [read post]
